Editorial: New Directions
Was the General Synod clear about its decision that pension benefits to survivors of a civil partnership were to be provided on the same basis as they are currently paid to surviving spouses? Perhaps not.
Whilst many may have made life-long loving commitments to each other, such commitments are not intrinsic to civil partnerships. Whereas marriage is entered into through the making of solemn vows, a civil partnership (as defined by the Act) is ‘a relationship between two people of the same sex which is formed when they register as civil partners of each other’, i.e. a civil partnership requires no vows, no life-long commitment, no love, no sexual acts, no fidelity – just signatures on a piece of paper.
Of course, the majority of civil partnerships involve relationships built on much more than a piece of paper, but it is possible to identify other situations in which people could legally and morally enter a civil partnership and, in so doing, be entitled to the pensions generously agreed by Synod.
Take, for example, an elderly female cleric concerned about the poverty of a young unmarried mother, whom she has baptised as a baby. That cleric has prayed daily for an improvement in the young mother’s material circumstances. Could this pension provision be the answer to her prayers? All she has to do is register a civil partnership and die.
Or how about the octogenarian priest who sees the church he loves abandoning the faith? Why not enter into a civil partnership with a young seminarian? And let the ‘surviving partner’s pension’ help fund a priest in an Ordinariate? Not gold digging, you understand; just taking advantage of legal rights and provisions, and the generosity of General Synod.