By David Lindsay
The present title derives, not from its conferral on Henry VIII by the Pope, but from its conferral by Parliament on Henry's son, Edward VI. Not that it has ever been peculiarly British or English; various monarchs have used it in various times and places, and Popes have conferred it on a number of people, so that, for example, Catherine of Aragon was a Defender of the Faith in her own right.
Some Commonwealth Realms retain it, and several have done so in the past, abolishing it only in abolishing the monarchy itself. Perhaps most strikingly, it was retained throughout the existence of the Irish Free State.
If and when the Paramount Chief of the Great Council of Chiefs of Fiji is once again Queen there, then this title should certainly be included as a formal reassertion of the Christian character of the place by the indigenous Melanesians, most of whom are Methodists, as the society in which Hindus and Muslims have chosen to settle and are welcome to make a contribution, but which in its fundamentals they must as accept as it is. No wonder that most people also wish to retain it here.
Defence against what? Most obviously Islam. And defence of what? The status of the monarch as Supreme Governor of the Church of England and Defender of the Faith was a key reason why even Tony Blair was unable to legislate for the extension of legal marriage to same-sex couples. In that capacity, the Queen simply could not have signed such a Bill into law.
But would not Islam be a very secure barrier indeed to such a change? Yes, but this is a very secure barrier against both of them. As Supreme Governor of the Church of England and Defender of the Faith, the Queen could no more sign into law a Bill legalising polygamy, or otherwise giving effect to Sharia, than she could sign into law a Bill legalising marriage between persons of the same sex.




.jpg)
By Alex Strangewayes-Booth, BBC News
From Christian Today
LEAD ARTICLE – New Directions, May 2012
By Madeleine Davies, Church Times
From the Eastern Daily Press
From Cranmer
As readers of Anglican Mainstream will be aware, there has been increasing concern over the last six months of the revisionist direction of the Diocese of Southwark.
by John Richardson
By Hilary White, LifeSite News
By Maev Kennedy, Guardian
By Andrew Carey, CEN
Commenting on today's publication of the report by the Joint Committee on the Government's Draft House of Lords Reform Bill, the Bishop of Norwich, the Rt Rev Graham James said:
By Norman Tebbit, Telegraph
By Edward Malnick, Telegraph