In a move that has attracted criticism from all sides, the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) is investigating some websites that carry C4M advertising.
Apparently, some people think it is “offensive” to advertise a campaign that simply wants to uphold the current law on marriage.
If supporting the current law is “offensive”, what would happen to supporters of traditional marriage if the law on marriage is changed?
[...] But on another level, it is a troubling sign of what may happen if marriage is redefined. Will the authorities pounce on every utterance in support of traditional marriage?
Will activists demand punitive action every time someone thoughtlessly uses the deeply offensive, heterosexist phrase “husband and wife”?
Yes, the ASA has lost all sense perspective. But a loss of perspective is what happens when ordinary people are ignored.




.gif)
Hat Tip:
By Steve Fountain, CitizenLink
By John-Henry Westen, LifeSite News
By Carolyn Moynihan, MercatorNet
By Tim Stanley, Telegraph
By Stephen Gray, Pink News
By James Chapman, Mailonline
By Bill Muehlenberg, CultureWatch
By Simon Walters, Mailonline
From Pink News
From The Christian Institute
By John Bingham, Telegraph
By Robert R Reilly, MercatorNet
By Michael Kirke, MercatorNet
From Cranmer
By Rod Dreher, The American Conservative
By Ben Johnson, LifeSite News