From Queerty.com
In response to New York’s recently introduced marriage equality bill, the so-called National Organization for Marriage got a bunch of pictures of black people and some guy who sounds like Foghorn Leghorn to repeat the same lies about indoctrinating schoolchildren that they ran in 2009. They accuse us of exploiting children and in response we say, “NOOO! We’re not gonna make kids learn about homosexuality, we swear! It’s not like we’re trying to recruit your children or anything.” But let’s face it—that’s a lie. We want educators to teach future generations of children to accept queer sexuality. In fact, our very future depends on it.
The battle over Tennessee’s “Don’t Say Gay Bill” has made this most apparent. Why would anybody get all up in arms about punishing teachers who mention queers in the classroom unless we wanted teachers to do just that? In response against the bill, FCKH8 hired some little girls to drop F-bombs in their online PSAs and gave out hundreds of “Don’t B H8N on the Homos” t-shirts, wristbands, pins and stickers to school children in front of TV cameras. Recruiting children? You bet we are.
Why would we push anti-bullying programs or social studies classes that teach kids about the historical contributions of famous queers unless we wanted to deliberately educate children to accept queer sexuality as normal?
Dr Jennifer Roback Morse interviews Miriam Grossman, MD, author of "Unprotected" and "You're Teaching My Child What?" and a psychiatrist formerly with the UCLA Student Health Service.
Update: I have family in Seattle Washington who signed this petition, and as of today, they have not been threatened, vandalized etc. But we must stand with those signatories who were. One great way of doing so is to sign the 
The impact of gay marriage (see the coverage on NY) on the rest of us is just beginning to be manifest — see below from the New York Press, especially on 'non-monogamy' (formerly known as 'the affair' or 'being unfaithful'). According to its practitioners, gay marriage operates according to different ground rules from traditional marriage, which make it more progressive and trendy, even more therapeutic (!), than traditional marriage. This sexual opening up of marriage, launched by gay marrieds, may (or may not) work for them, but for the rest of us this is extremely worrying. Marriage has meant sexual exclusivity (in theory, and often in practice) and been the means by which women and men attached to each other and to the children their sexual union had created, bonding them together to rear their offspring, who need both a mother and a father. Opening this up to other partners will destroy (or at least seriously damage) this mechanism; who most loses are the ones with greatest vulnerabilities, the children. Below is from the important poly site: 
[...] Just a week ago, about 300 placard-waving opponents and supporters of the proposed anti-homophobia policy got into a tense confrontation outside the Burnaby School Board office. While critics of policy 5.45 say it would infringe on parents' rights, sexualize schools and is being pushed by proponents of a leftwing ideology, its supporters say it's a key element in combating homophobia's verbal and physical manifestations in schools.
by Robert W. Patterson The Ruth Institute
From Jennifer Roback Morse
Philip M. Sutton, Ph.D., LMFT, LCSW, LP
As Phyllis Schlafly points out in her book "Feminist Fantasies" … for centuries, famous left-wing men have treated "their wives and mistresses like unpaid servants."
WASHINGTON
…Yet at the very end of 2010, the conversation about gay marriage took a very different turn. In early December, three philosophers—Sherif Girgis, Robert George, and Ryan Anderson published one of the most important efforts in recent years to defend traditional marriage from a purely philosophical standpoint. Though the paper, published in the 
From Prof Dale Kuehne's 
David Blankenhorn analyzes data from 35 nations and demonstrates that support for marriage is weakest in those countries where support for same-sex marriage is strongest. For example, during the 1990s, Norway, Sweden and Denmark legalized same-sex marriage.
In my various exchanges with people on the other side of the fence on this matter, they keep insisting that they want to argue for the Jeffrey John’s model (which is the gay equivalent of ‘traditional marriage’). There are various problems with this. In the main, LG people are neither subscribing to nor living by the JJ model (in terms of statistics and surveys). Moreover, LG people who provide secular leadership for and on behalf of the LG communities are not pushing the JJ model. As well, from what I know of living on LG Christian sites, there are no Christian organizations which are presently providing an apologetic for and promoting the JJ model. 
…Redefining marriage redefines the way in which generations relate to one another. It is ludicrous to believe that we would feel the full impact of such a change in a few years. It will take at least a generation, a full thirty years or more, before the full effects of redefining marriage work themselves out throughout the social system. 
Dr. Morse’s testimony to the Rhode Island legislature yesterday re: SSM
The reasons for unbelief are more complex than many atheists let on.