an information resource
for orthodox Anglicans

Obama takes swipe at pro-life activists, ignores Gosnell during Planned Parenthood speech

April 27th, 2013 Jill Posted in pro-life/abortion Comments Off

By John Jalsevac, LifeSite News

President Obama took a combative stance during his speech to Planned Parenthood today, pledging his unconditional support to the abortion giant, and, at more than one point, taking a swipe at pro-life activists who oppose the organization.

“No matter how great the challenge, no matter how fierce the opposition, there’s one thing that the past few years have shown,” said President Obama, “that Planned Parenthood is not going anywhere. It’s not going anywhere today. It’s not going anywhere tomorrow."

He continued: “As long as we’ve got to fight to make sure women have access to quality affordable healthcare, and as long as we’ve got to fight to protect a women’s right to make her own choices about her own health, I want you to know that you’ve also got a president who’s going to be with you fighting with you every step of the way.”

Obama was greeted enthusiastically by the crowd of some 1,000 Planned Parenthood supporters. "You're making me blush," he said in response to the protracted standing ovation.

During his speech he aimed his sights directly at pro-life activists. "The fact is, after decades of progress, there's still those who want to turn back the clock to policies more suited to the 1950s than the 21st Century," Obama said. "And they've been involved in an orchestrated and historic effort to roll back basic rights when it comes to women's health."

"When politicians try to turn Planned Parenthood into a punching bag, they're not just talking about you," he said. "They're talking about the millions of women who you serve."

Read here

Sarah Palin responds to President Obama's speech here

 

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

The ‘entire abortion industry’ is on trial in Gosnell case: 37 pro-life leaders in open letter

April 26th, 2013 Jill Posted in pro-life/abortion Comments Off

From LifeSite News

More than three dozen leaders of national pro-life organizations from across the country have signed an open letter calling on all Americans to pay attention to the trial of Kermit Gosnell, saying that the horrors described daily in the courtroom “represent the precise reality of the state of the abortion industry today in our country.”

“Although only one abortionist is being prosecuted today, the entire abortion industry is on trial,” write the pro-life leaders.
 
Gosnell faces four counts of first-degree murder of babies born alive, third-degree murder of a patient who died of a drug overdose following a botched 2009 abortion, and multiple counts of performing late-term abortions past the legal limit in Pennsylvania. All told, Gosnell faces some 380 criminal charges.
 
“Despite the graphic nature of the testimony that could only come from the darkest depths of human depravity, we the undersigned have further evidence that abortionist Gosnell’s practices are reflective of abuses that characterize the entire abortion industry,” the signatories wrote. “These abuses have been documented for decades through law enforcement activities, news reports, court documents, lawsuits, undercover investigations, and testimonies of former abortionists and their clients.”
 
“Forty years of abortion on demand through all nine months of pregnancy has not brought women more dignity, made them freer, or advanced their equality,” the letter continues. “Instead, as the trial of abortionist Gosnell cruelly testifies, abortion has made women the subject of predatory practices, ugly disfigurement, gruesome deaths, and conditions not even fitting for animals.”
 
Read here
 
 
 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

GMC and RCM must now move urgently to review their abortion guidance in light of Glasgow midwives court ruling

April 25th, 2013 Jill Posted in pro-life/abortion Comments Off

By Peter Saunders, CMF

Two Roman Catholic midwives have today won a landmark legal battle to avoid taking any part in abortion procedures.

Mary Doogan, 58, and Concepta Wood, 52, (pictured) lost a previous case against NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (GGC) when the court ruled that their human rights had not been violated as they were not directly involved in terminations.
 
However appeal judges have now ruled their right to conscientious objection means they can refuse to delegate, supervise or support staff involved in abortions.
 
The Guardian,BBCand Scottish TV have all reported on today’s ruling and I have previously blogged more extensively on the case hereand here. The midwives have understandably welcomed today’s verdict.
 
The judgment is hugely significant and means that official guidance from both the Royal College of Midwives (RCM) and the General Medical Council (GMC) will almost certainly now need revision.
 
The Abortion Act 1967 gives healthcare professionals the right to conscientiously object to ‘participate’ in abortion but the scope of the word‘participate’ has been the matter of some legal dispute.
 
But Lady Dorrian, who heard the challenge with Lord Mackay of Drumadoon and Lord McEwan, said: ‘In our view the right of conscientious objection extends not only to the actual medical or surgical termination but to the whole process of treatmentgiven for that purpose.’
 
She said the conscientious objection in the legislation is given ‘not because the acts in question were previously, or may have been, illegal’ but ‘because it is recognised that the process of abortion is felt by many people to be morally repugnant’.
 
Read here
 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Obama backs out of Planned Parenthood gala Thursday: White House

April 24th, 2013 Jill Posted in pro-life/abortion Comments Off

By John Jalsevac, LifeSite News

President Obama will no longer deliver the keynote address at Planned Parenthood's gala in Washington, D.C., as originally planned.

Obama had been widely criticized for attending the gala in the shadow of the trial of abortionist Kermit Gosnell, who stands accused of murdering several newborn babies after botched late-term abortions. Critics had also pointed to Planned Parenthood lobbyist Alisa LaPolt Snow's testimony before the Florida House apparently defending infanticide, as well as revelations of horrendous conditions at a Planned Parenthood clinic in Delaware.
 
White House spokesman Jay Carney announced that Obama would no longer be headlining the gala for the country's largest abortion provider at a press briefing this morning. He cited the president's desire to spent more time at a memorial ceremony for the victims of the West Texas, fertilizer plant explosion as the reason for the schedule change.
 
However, the president is slated to address Planned Parenthood supporters at a smaller event on Friday morning.
 
In a press release published just yesterday that announced the president's planned appearance at their gala, Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards heaped accolades on the president, saying: “President Obama has done more than any president in history for women’s health and rights.”
 
Planned Parenthood has admitted that it knew about conditions at Gosnell's "House of Horrors," but took no steps to report him to the authorities.
 
Read here
 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Abortion ruling welcomed by SPUC who backed Glasgow midwives’ case

April 24th, 2013 Jill Posted in pro-life/abortion Comments Off

By John Smeaton, SPUC

SPUC has given the midwives its backing throughout the case. Responding to the judgment, Paul Tully, SPUC's general secretary, told the media earlier today:

“Today’s verdict is very welcome and we congratulate Connie and Mary on their tenacity and deep sense of professionalism. We hope that the Health Board will abide by this verdict and enable life to return to normal for Connie and Mary. The result is a tremendous victory for these devoted and caring professional women. This outcome will be a great relief to all midwives, nurses and doctors who may be under pressure to supervise abortion procedures and who are wondering whether the law protects their right to opt out.

The difference this judgment makes is that hospital managers must recognise that the legal right to opt out of abortion goes beyond those who directly undertake abortions.

Read here

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Obama will address a Planned Parenthood gala. This is the group that knew about the Gosnell abortion horror and didn’t go to the police

April 24th, 2013 Jill Posted in Politics, pro-life/abortion Comments Off

By Tim Stanley, Telegraph

According to his schedule, President Obama will take time out this week to address a gala thrown by Planned Parenthood – the abortion industry’s favourite lobby.
 
It’s an extraordinary move, not just because the issue is so controversial but because Planned Parenthood has recently disgraced itself over the Gosnell trial. To recap, Kermit Gosnell is the “doctor” is accused of killing hundreds of babies during late-term abortions by removing them screaming from the womb and then severing their heads from their bodies with a pair of scissors. He also operated a filthy clinic covered in cat feces and used untrained employees to carry out medical procedures. A question that has repeatedly been asked is “Who knew about this?” and “What did they do about it?” Last week, Planned Parenthood answered with “We did” and “As little as possible.”
 
The cat got out the bag at the Planned Parenthood Southeastern Pennsylvania's annual Spring Gathering. A report from Philly.com quotes Dayle Steinberg, the organisation’s president and chief executive saying,
"The Gosnell trial has shifted the focus off the high-quality services we provide … These are criminal, horrendous . . . acts and should be appropriately punished."
 
Steinberg said that when Gosnell was in practice, women would sometimes come to Planned Parenthood for services after first visiting Gosnell's West Philadelphia clinic, and would complain to staff about the conditions there.
 
"We would always encourage them to report it to the Department of Health," Steinberg said.
So women came to Planned Parenthood, spoke of filthy conditions and potential malpractice and Planned Parenthood’s response was to urge them to report it to the Department of Health?! That’s an astonishing admission: rather than rushing to help the traumatised women in their care by contacting the police, they advised them to go home and pen a letter of complaint.
 
Read here
 
Read also:  Sanger, Obama and Evil by Bill Muehlenberg
 
 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

That didn’t last long: networks completely ignoring Gosnell trial…again

April 23rd, 2013 Jill Posted in Media, pro-life/abortion Comments Off

By Matt Philbin, LifeSite News

that didn’t last long. In fact, it barely happened at all. After a month of ignoring the trial of Kermit Gosnell, the Philadelphia abortionist accused of murdering one woman and seven infants, it looked like the media had been shamed into covering the story.

Barely. Even after the most gruesome detail in a trial full of them came out – a baby who survived an abortion “swimming” in a toilet and “trying to get out” – the silence resumed. In fact, the only major news outlet that bothered to report on that testimony was The Chicago Tribune. CNN.com mentioned it, but it got no air time.
 
The Gosnell trial has returned to the obscurity the pro-abortion media hoped all along to preserve.
 
What coverage there was started on Thursday April 11 when The Washington Post discovered the story (though the Post mainly engaged in media navel-gazing over the lack of coverage, and allowed its executive editor to claim he’d never heard of the trial). CNN began covering it on Friday, April 12, and CBS gave it play on “This Morning” the following Monday. And on Wednesday, April 17, Savannah Guthrie included a question about the case in a long, wide-ranging interview with President Obama.
 
There endeth the coverage. ABC has never once mentioned Gosnell. CBS hasn’t followed up, and NBC has yet to do any reporting on the story. Yes, the Post is covering it, but in the most antiseptic of ways. On Sunday, April 21, it published a piece titled, “Problems at Pa. abortion clinic point to lack of facilities oversight.”
 
Read here
 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Gosnell fog blankets Britain

April 20th, 2013 Jill Posted in Media, pro-life/abortion Comments Off

By George Conger, Get Religion

Last week my colleague at GetReligion Mollie Hemingway broke the American media blockade surrounding the Kermit Gosnell trial. Mollie, and Kirsten Powers writing in USA Today, reported on the absence of national press coverage of the trial of the Philadelphia abortionist — questioning why reporters who never tired of Sandra Flake or Komen Foundation stories shied away from this national news item.

Some members of the press and newspapers have sought to repair their damaged credibility and are now playing catch up, while others have retreated into the bunker (Nixonian allusions spring to mind but would likely be lost on the miscreants).
 
However, the British press appears not to have received the memo. As of the date of this post, the BBC has yet to air a story on the Gosnell affair (though it did run one web piece on 15 April after the Hemingway storm broke and the American media mea culpa.) ITV and Channel 4 have yet to report.
 
The newspapers have not raised the average. The Times ran one story on 13 April, but the Guardian and Independent have remained silent. The Telegraph does a little better — it had one news article dated 12 April entitled “Kermit Gosnell: US abortion doctor could be put to death over ‘baby charnel house’”. Op-Ed writers Damian Thompson and Tim Stanley weighed in on the Gosnell story as well as the media blackout. On 12 April Thompson wrote:
But British readers must know about the case of Dr Kermit Gosnell, which has been played down in the American media – possibly because the allegations of a homicidal abortion doctor don’t fit into their pro-choice narrative.
Well, Philadelphia is very far away after all. And a story about an abortionist on trial for infanticide in Philadelphia may not be interesting to the British newspaper reading public. American newspapers are notorious for their lack of in-depth overseas reporting due to the perception that its readers don’t care about the outside world.
 
Read here
 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Savita Halappanavar – Medical misadventure verdict does not justify changing Ireland’s abortion law

April 20th, 2013 Jill Posted in pro-life/abortion Comments Off

by Peter Saunders, CMF

The jury in the Savita Halappanavar inquest has returned a unanimous verdict of death by medical misadventure.

Savita Halappanavar (pictured), 31, was an Indian woman who tragically died in Ireland from overwhelming infection after allegedly being denied an abortion.
 
Her case has been seized upon by the pro-choice lobby as grounds for liberalising Ireland’s abortion law.
 
Savita was 17 weeks pregnant when admitted to the University Hospital Galway on 21 October 2012 with an inevitable miscarriage.
 
At that time a fetal heart beat was detected and doctors opted not to end the pregnancy by inducing labour but instead waited for her to deliver naturally.
 
Her baby was born dead three days later on 24 October.
 
Savita died from multi-organ failure from septic shock due to an E coli infection on 28 October, four days after her baby’s birth.
 
The coroner, Dr Ciaran MacLoughlin, said the verdict of medical misadventure did not mean that deficiencies or systems failures in University Hospital Galway necessarily contributed to Mrs Halappanavar's death; these were just findings in relation to the management of her care.
 
Read here
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

The Gosnell case and Ann Furedi’s reaction to it

April 19th, 2013 Jill Posted in News, pro-life/abortion Comments Off

From SPUC's Why I am Pro Life Blog

(NB: Ann Furedi is CEO of BPAS, the British Pregnancy Advisory Service)

Kermit Gosnell, the US abortionist, currently stands trial, accused of 43 offences, including the murder of seven babies and one woman at his abortion centre. However, the full extent of Gosnell's wickedness goes way beyond the eight counts of murder he is charged with. The grand jury report on Gosnell was published in January 2011 and documents the full extent of Gosnell's activity. Hundreds, if not thousands, of born-alive babies have been brutally killed by Gosnell and his employees in the most appalling of ways.

Many of the photos are disturbing – bags containing baby remains stocked in freezers, severed feet kept in jars, photos of babies killed by having their spinal cord cut at the back of the neck, babies in the third trimester killed and thrown into bins, unsanitary operating rooms, serious injuries inflicted upon women, non-medically trained people employed in nursing roles, the list goes on. The full grand jury report can be seen in full here

The trial itself has revealed even more horrific details about what went on in Gosnell's abortion facility. One former employee, Sherry West, described an incident which “really freaked (her) out” and related to the jury how she heard a child scream who was born alive following an abortion.
 
Another employee, Stephen Massof, testified that when women were given medicine to speed up their deliveries, “it would rain foetuses. Foetuses and blood all over the place.”
 
Another Gosnell clinic worker testified that she took photos of one particularly large baby, referred to by prosecutors as “Baby A,” with her cell phone that was estimated to be about 30-weeks gestation. Baby A had been delivered alive into a toilet where she cut the baby’s throat.
 
Dr. Sam Gulino, chief medical examiner for the City of Philadelphia, who discussed his examination of the remains of 47 foetuses seized by law enforcement authorities from his “House of Horrors” abortion clinic. The remains were frozen and stored in a variety of containers, including milk jugs and cat food cans.
 
?Until a few days ago there was a media blackout – none of the mainstream media were covering the story, particularly because of the pro-abortion bias amongst journalists and news correspondents.
 
Read here
 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

MPs urge Government to monitor gender of aborted babies

April 19th, 2013 Jill Posted in pro-life/abortion Comments Off

Fiona Bruce MPFrom Christian Concern

MPs have called on the Government to compile statistics on the gender of aborted babies in a Parliamentary debate this week.

It comes after health minister Earl Howe revealed that birth statistics in the UK show that women in some communities could be seeking abortions on the sole basis of their child's gender.

The findings – revealed in response to a Parliamentary question posed by cross-bench peer Lord Alton – were made after Government officials analysed the boy-girl ratios of births between 2007 and 2011.

Ministers have admitted that there is a discrepancy between the number of males and females being born in the UK. But the Department of Health has refused to release figures on the nationalities of women generally giving birth to more boys than girls, stating that it was not in the “public interest” to do so.

An undercover investigation by the Daily Telegraph last year uncovered evidence of doctors sanctioning abortions after women described the gender of their baby as the only reason for seeking a termination, even though abortion on the grounds of a child’s sex are illegal under the 1967 Abortion Act.

A Ten Minute Rule Bill calling for the Government to monitor the sex of aborted babies was presented jointly by Conservative MP Fiona Bruce and Labour MP Jim Dobbin this week, with its aims being supported by more than 50 MPs.

Read here


AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Protecting the unborn

April 18th, 2013 Jill Posted in pro-life/abortion Comments Off

By David Smyth, Evangelical Alliance

The World Health Organisation estimates that there are somewhere between 40 and 50 million abortions carried out worldwide each year. To give some sort of numerical comparison, the Second World War claimed the lives of around 60 million people.
In 2007 – 40 years since the introduction of the 1967 Abortion Act – the total number of abortions carried out in England and Wales was reported at 6.7 million. Today this figure has risen to well over seven million. Again to give some context, this equates to the entire population of Scotland and Northern Ireland combined.
 
In 2011, in England and Wales there were 723,913 live births and 189,931 abortions. This means that for every four children born, one has been aborted.
 
These numbers are difficult to take in. It might be helpful to read them again, slowly. We can be a little dismissive about statistics, but sometimes the facts are just overwhelming – especially when you think about the man, woman and unborn child behind each one.
 
It is a serious criminal offence to carry out an abortion in England and Wales outside of any of the permitted grounds of the 1967 Act. Over 98 per cent of abortions are carried out on one ground alone, that of mental health. Concerns have been raised by organisations like CMF about a deliberate misinterpretation of these mental health grounds and the lack of objective medical evidence in most cases. This flagrant abuse of the law has created de facto abortion on demand, a completely unintended and unexpected consequence of MP David Steel’s Private Members Bill all those years ago. Indulging my legal tendencies for a moment. it’s entirely possible to foresee a future police or government enquiry finding criminal culpability in these mass ultra vires (beyond power) abortions.
 
Read here
 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Liberal commentator: we ‘made a decision’ not to cover Gosnell to protect abortion

April 18th, 2013 Jill Posted in pro-life/abortion Comments Off

By Ben Johnson, LifeSite News

A left-wing media commentator has said what many pro-life activists long believed: that an overwhelmingly liberal media consciously chose not to cover the trial of Kermit Gosnell, because they feared it would undermine their political stance on abortion.

“For what it’s worth, I do think that those of us on the Left have made a decision not to cover this trial because we worry that it’ll compromise abortion rights,” said Marc Lamont Hill, a Columbia University professor known for his frequent appearance on Fox News. “Whether you agree with abortion or not, I do think there’s a direct connection between the media’s failure to cover this and our own political commitments on the Left.”
 
Hill said he thought the captivity of media coverage to a “progressive” political agenda was a negative development but one that may be insurmountable.
 
“I think it’s a bad idea,” he said of the blackout. “I think it’s dangerous, but I think that’s the way it is.”
 
Read here
 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Planned Parenthood endorses post-birth abortion

April 16th, 2013 Jill Posted in pro-life/abortion Comments Off

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Monitor abortions by gender to protect unborn girls, say MPs

April 15th, 2013 Jill Posted in pro-life/abortion Comments Off

By John Bingham, Telegraph

MPs will tomorrow urge the Government to introduce monitoring of the sex of aborted babies to establish whether or not British couples are being granted terminations illegally on grounds of gender.

It follows an investigation by The Telegraph last year which uncovered evidence of doctors agreeing to remove foetuses simply because they were either male or female.
 
Earl Howe, the health minister, disclosed recently that Government analysis of birth figures showed that illegal “sex-selection abortion” could be taking place within some immigrant communities in the UK.
 
But the Department of Health has refused to release a list of nationalities whose mothers tend to have far more boys than girls, arguing that it is not in the “public interest” to do so.
 
Now a cross-party group of MPs has launched a parliamentary drive to persuade the Government to record the gender of aborted foetuses.
 
Fiona Bruce, the Conservative backbencher, and Labour’s Jim Dobbin, are jointly introducing a private bill to be debated tomorrow, with the support of dozens of MPs.
 
 
 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Doctor who killed seven new-born babies by cutting their spinal cords with scissors may face death penalty

April 15th, 2013 Jill Posted in pro-life/abortion Comments Off

By Peter Saunders, CMF

The Daily Telegraph (see hereand here) has this week run the story of a US abortionist who is facing a potential death sentence after being charged with the gruesome murders of seven babies and a mother.

Dr Kermit Gosnell (pictured), who is on trial in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, allegedly ran a filthy and dangerous ‘abortion mill’ from his clinic, where he terminated pregnancies after the state's 24-week legal limit.
 
24 weeks is the age beyond which babies will generally survive in a neonatal unit although babies born as young as 22 weeks have been known to survive in exceptional circumstances.
 
The Telegraph reports it as follows:
 
Read here
 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

The Lethal Logic Behind the Abortion Rights Movement

April 14th, 2013 Jill Posted in pro-life/abortion Comments Off

by Peter Wehner, Commentary Magazine

Kirsten Powers wrote a powerful piece in USA Today on the murder trial of Pennsylvania abortion doctor Kermit Gosnell. (The 72-year-old Gosnell is charged with killing a woman patient and seven babies.)
 
By all accounts Gosnell was a butcher of newborn, or about to be born, babies. The specifics are gruesome but probably necessary to comprehend the level of depravity we’re talking about. So here we go.
 
[...]  About all this I wanted to make several points, the first of which is that this is the kind of brutality many people in the pro-life movement warned was at the end of the lethal logic behind the abortion rights movement. If we accept–and in some quarters, celebrate–abortion as a modern emancipation, you end up with people like Kermit Gosnell, who view an unborn child that has been targeted for abortion as marked for death even after birth. And before you dismiss Gosnell’s views as rare among those who champion abortion rights, consider the views of representatives of Planned Parenthood, an organization which (a) receives $500 million in government subsidies and (b) is the most conspicuous abortion rights group in America.
 
Read here
 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Obama’s new budget calls for $30 million more in abortion funding

April 13th, 2013 Jill Posted in Politics, pro-life/abortion Comments Off

By Elise Hilton, LifeSite News

Obama’s new budget is in. The usual political wrangling is taking place, but there are some undeniable facts about the budget. Taxes are going up (is anyone surprised?), but some of those taxes are “sneaky” ones on senior citizens designed to fund things other than their health. In all, the president’s budget will raise taxes by $1.1 trillion dollars. (That number shouldn’t shock you: President Obama is the first president to ever spend $4 trillion in one year.)

One area of great concern in this budget is abortion funding. Despite the fact that a solid majority of Americans don’t want to pay for other people’s abortions, Obama’s new budget calls for $30 million more to do just that. In 2011, $542 million taxpayer dollars went to Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest provider of abortions. Planned Parenthood is a non-profit organization, yet reported last year revenues in excess of $87 million, and assets over $1 billion.
 
In addition to heavily funding Planned Parenthood, the budget will fund abortions for Peace Corps volunteers, prison inmates, immigration detainees, and American military personnel.
 
Read here
 
 
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

‘House of horrors’ alleged at abortion clinic

April 12th, 2013 Jill Posted in Media, pro-life/abortion Comments Off

From NBC News

A doctor whose abortion clinic was a filthy, foul-smelling "house of horrors" that was overlooked by regulators for years was charged Wednesday with murder, accused of delivering seven babies alive and then using scissors to kill them.

Hundreds of other babies likely died in the squalid clinic that Dr. Kermit Gosnell ran from 1979 to 2010, Philadelphia District Attorney Seth Williams said at a news conference.

"My comprehension of the English language can't adequately describe the barbaric nature of Dr. Gosnell," he added.

Williams said he might seek the death penalty for Gosnell, who with nine of his associates, including his wife, was arrested on Wednesday.

Gosnell was charged with murder, infanticide, conspiracy, abortion at 24 or more weeks and other charges.

Pennsylvania law prohibits abortion after 24 weeks except to save the life of the mother or avoid serious health risk to her.

In a nearly 300-page grand jury report filled with ghastly, stomach-turning detail, prosecutors said Pennsylvania regulators ignored complaints of barbaric conditions at Gosnell's clinic, which catered to poor, immigrant and minority women in the city's impoverished West Philadelphia section.

Read here

Read also: On Kermit Gosnell by Bill Muehlenberg

 

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

‘Infant beheadings, severed baby feet,’ but media still ignoring Gosnell trial

April 12th, 2013 Jill Posted in Media, pro-life/abortion Comments Off

by John Jalsevac, LifeSite News

It’s gruesome. It’s dramatic. It’s arguably the abortion-related story of the decade.

It's the murder trial of "House of Horrors" abortionist Kermit Gosnell. And the mainstream media is almost completely ignoring it.

But cracks are beginning to show in what pro-life activists argue can only plausibly be explained as a deliberate blackout by a largely pro-abortion media of one of the biggest stories of 2013.

Recently 21 leaders in the pro-life and conservative movements signed a statement denouncing national broadcast networks ABC, CBS, and NBC for failing to give so much as a nod to the Gosnell trial.

Now they have been joined by a U.S. Congressman and a leading feminist columnist.

In a statement on the House floor today, Rep. Scott Perry, R-PA, slammed President Obama and the media for turning a blind eye to Gosnell’s alleged misdeeds.

"Mr. President, your silence is deafening," Rep. Perry said today, according to The Hill. "Are you so blind, are you so intractable, are you so extreme that you yourself can't even call this out for what it is, something that is reprehensible? Pro-life or pro-choice, this is reprehensible.

"It is worthy of your attention," he said. "It is worthy of your leadership. It is worthy of your direction."

"The media doesn't want to talk about it," Perry added. "Not NBC, CBS, ABC, CNBC, not Fox, and not the leaders of our nation, not the president."

Read here


AddThis Social Bookmark Button