By Fr John Flynn, Zenit
Fundamental Liberties Call Out for Defense
Working out how to protect human rights remains a thorny problem, as recent events demonstrate. On Wednesday the International Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for Sudanese President Omar Hassan al-Bashir.
Sudan’s leader is accused of being responsible for the murder of tens of thousands of people in the Darfur region of the country in past years.
Bashir reacted to the move, explained a Washington Post article Thursday, by expelling many of the foreign aid organizations that provide assistance to the refugees, numbered at more than 1 million, in Dafur.
On the other extreme, in Canada human rights tribunals are under attack for running amok. Margaret Wente, a columnist for Canada’s Globe and Mail Newspaper, described the plight of John Fulton, a gym owner in St. Catharines, Ontario, in a March 3 article.
Fulton, who runs a women-only gym, is faced with heavy legal expenses in order to fight an action taken before the Ontario Human Rights Commission for having refused membership to a man who is a "preoperative transsexual."
Wente explained that while people who initiate such claims have their legal expenses financed by the state, the defendants can face costs of up to $100,000.
The gym case is far from an isolated episode, Wente noted, and repeated instances of such frivolous claims are laying a heavy burden on Canadian businesses.
Meanwhile, in Australia, last year the federal government appointed a committee to investigate if the country needs a charter of rights. The head of the committee, Jesuit Father Frank Brennan, recently warned of an "evangelical fervor" in the legal community for a bill of rights, reported an article in the Australian newspaper, Feb. 27.
Father Brennan declared that there is no clear evidence that the two charters already in existence, in Victoria and the Australian Capital Territory, had done anything to better the protection of rights.
According to the article, he warned the Victorian model was "a device for the delivery of a soft-Left sectarian agenda — a device which will be discarded or misconstrued whenever the rights articulated do not comply with that agenda."
Read the rest of this entry »